2k vs 4k monitor reddit As far as we all know: EFT is really bad optimized. Internet Culture (Viral) but someone suggested that since my graphics card is not that good for 4K, buying a 2K monitor would be much better saying that changing the resolution quality from 3840x2160 to 2580x1440 on a 4K 2K is not 1440p. (and 60hz of course ) So i researched some 32'' 2K monitors for my laptop. If I was doing just coding, I’d get the 4k panels instead. Even on stuff like lossless scaling. 108 ppi vs 92 ppi is a pretty significant difference. So, i recently built a new PC, the market seemed to fall perfectly into place just as i got the money to build a new one and for just under £1000 i managed to get an absolute beast of a computer (at least relative A 24" 4K monitor at 200% scaling would be absolutely awesome: text would be of exactly the same size as on a 24" FHD monitor, but it would be much crisper and easier to read. At these sizes, the difference between 4K and 1440p is nowhere near as significant as between 1440p and a 1080p. Best combo of performance and value My monitor history: Used a cheap 1080p 60hz IPS for 5 years-> PG279Q 1440p 165hz IPS for 1 year (RMA issues) -> back to that old 1080p for a month -> now currently driving a LG 27GN950 160hz 4k monitor. The Silph Road is a grassroots network of trainers whose Q2 : Since 4K can significantly tax my laptop, can I make changes to monitor OSD, and change resolution to 2K ? Q3 : If i change the 4K monitor's resolution to 2K, will 2K content on this configuration look exactly the same as a 2k content on a native 2K resolution monitor OR it will downgrade ? Many many thanks for answering these queries . And colour gamut is also better unless it is a higher end TV around 1L. At least with 4K being used to mean UDH they are nearly the same resolution (4096px wide vs 3840px wide) but 2K and QHD are 1. Better switch on DSR factor or upscaling in GPU control and run 4k res on 2k monitor. that used the standards are around 4 to 5k each. Im between 4k ıps and 1440p oled. My friend has a 4k monitor and comparing them, I don't really see the point in having such a high resolution. Or check it out in the app stores 4K 144Hz Monitor Owners - 2K Gaming Resolution on a 4K Monitor? I need help deciding between a 1440p 144hz monitor and a 4k 60hz monitor. You cannot play 4k on the 1440p screen if the game is too easy to run. Well yes. It does look fine but you can see a difference. Even with my aging gpu, as long as I get at least 90-100 fps with gsync it feels so much better. with 1440p real-estate on a upscaled 4k monitor it looks crisp, and without upscaling 4k its hard to see, but thats the only good thing thats really noticeable on 4k anyways. I would stick with 2k 144hz. 2K isn't a monitor resolution, stop saying 2K to mean 2560x1440. Sometimes the common resolutions that fill the gaps are referred to with a plus; for instance 1600x900 is considered HD+, 3200x1800 is QHD+, and 5K is UHD+. As a do it all monitor I still find a big enough (32"+) 16:9 monitor to be best. Now for you? I suggest to grab an 1080p high framerate display if you are into fast pacing games or online shooters. With my upgraded graphics card, I’m thinking of upgrading to a 32 It depends whether you want more real estate or a ‘retina-esque’ display. I'm sure there are people with 4K monitors that are shit compared to some 1440p or 1080p monitors. I play on a very large (>100") 4k screen. The difference between a 28" and 32" is not huge though. 6" 1080 laptop and two 15. Running 1440p on a 4k monitor usually looks like crap. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing I want to know which will provide the best visual experience between a standard 16:9 4k monitor vs an ultra wide 21:9 2k monitor. To answer your second question, yes but it is minimal perceivable difference. Or check it out in the app stores Have you ever compared a game running 1440p on the 4K monitor vs native 1440p? Oh, honestly bud that'll be monitor dependant. With gaming and movies in mind, I'd lean towards 2K 27" is good for 2k resolution? 1440p on 27" has a similar pixel density to 1080p on 22", so yeah. Or check it out in the app stores -4K/60 -2k/165 detail settings again for the max details I could get and still get a solid 60 FPS at 4K and bounced back and forth between my 4K display, and my 1440 display (1440 display still locked at 60Hz). But if your fps are tanking than sticking to 2k is better. 4K gaming isn’t yet a viable option. 2k vs 4k monitor . HDR won't be as good on the CM After I see some videos with graphic comparison im quite unsure. the Proart 27" 2k (PA278QV) I'm looking to get a monitor for my first PC with really good color accuracy and clear picture above all else. Most games are very sharp, and almost like playing natively, but streaming 2k on 2k monitor is blurry for me, and effects like fog/rain in some titles completely ruin the whole experience Edit: I’m using 32’ LG monitor any performance issues if i have macbook screen on as well as 2 monitors (4k 27", 1080p 24") No, except that the latest versions of MacOS do not support Display Stream Compression anymore oddly. Dual 27 inch 1440p is the setup I rock for gaming and coding. Will I notice a difference between 2K and 4K? The noticeable difference between 2K and 4K depends on screen However, the difference isn't as big as 144hz compared to 60hz, just like the difference between 2K and 4K won't be as big as the difference between 1080p and 2K, so in the end it will all boil down to your preference, and especially the games you will play. r/buildapc. But can all 4K 144Hz monitor’s support 2k 144Hz? Often times the user manuals don’t list the max refresh rates for non-native resolutions as supported. Right now I’m running two 27” 1440p monitors, one for gaming with 1ms lag, the other as my side monitor. )? I mainly do programming and content creation and some light gaming. Is there much difference? Discussion On 4K vs 1440p, it depends on how much you’re willing to spend on the gpu. While you should generally stick to 2k (fyi, vanilla is 2k), 4k is best used on things that are large enough to see the fine details on, like mountains, dragons, city gates, etc. Is 32" 4k IPS monitor with 125% scaling the same as 27" 2k IPS monitor with 100% scaling ( I meant the size of texts, software, etc. Media just look better on VA monitors. Now I want to upgrade my monitor, aiming between those 2 resolutions. Smaller screens, it probably wouldn't matter at all. I can go for a 2k monitor You still wouldnt need 4k to justify the price hike. Any have tried between these 2 kind of monitors? And what was the better choice and experience 4k 144 no matter what. This monitor is only 4k because I do color sensitive work with high resolution images on it. The difference from 1440p to 4k is quite big. At 165hz you won't notice much difference. 2K for typography is right on the line with a 27”. with the 1440p real-estate the text almost looks like 1080p quality, but when upscaled to 1080 real-estate it looks crisp. I have a friend who has some eyesight issues and is only happy with his MBP Retina display. Hello everyone, I have been in a monitor debate with myself for a while now. also for a 32" - is it better to get curved or flat? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. A 2070 is the equivalent of a 1080, so you can certainly afford to use some 4k textures. The quality difference, whether its 32 inch or 27 inch is minimal for the untrained eye, or even the eye of most gamers. Personally, I would probably go 4k (assuming the rest of the monitor’s tech specs are up to snuff), but if you really really want to play 120fps in the I own a 144Hz refresh rate monitor, and with v-sync I can't notice the difference between 1k and 4k. 4K will typically be noticeably clearer due to pixel density. By going 4k, that means your vram load during gaming will increase (if not already maxed out at 1440p). 5ms difference) is larger than 2khz to 4khz (0. Having experienced both 4K 32” and 1440p on 32” with different setups I can tell you that 1440p and 4K are not equal at 32 inches. However, most games are locked to 60. Or check it out in the app stores Dual 49" Odyssey G9's VS single 55" 4k Monitor comments. Or check it out in the app stores Human eye can’t tell the difference between 2K and 4K for average monitor sizes Also according to science, Human eye can’t see beyond 30Hz For a 4k monitor (I'm guessing 32"?), these values'd be 0. In contrast, 4K still looks very sharp on 32″ monitors with roughly 140 ppi. correct. And a general thing: scaling is not a "drawback" of high ppi monitors, it is a perk. 120 only works on a select few games like Borderlands 3 and CoD. 120Hz is required only by very few competitive games, other than this, especially with VRR, it's I'm trying to decide between getting a 4k (BenQ EW3280U) or 2k (Gigabyte M32Q) monitor. You can always play at 1440p or even 1080p on the 4k screen if the games are too hard to run. Much worse contrast, black levels, etc. I run a 27in 4k in 4k - and am looking to replace it with a 32” because its just to small. 1440p monitors are the majority so they finally decided to add it when 4k monitors are basically taking over lol. The 165hz refresh rate is a nice thing to have, but the 60hz refresh rate is perfectly serviceable. I dont think 4k is still a viable resolution choice for PC gaming due to hardware requirement. The difference between 1440p and 4k isn't much, but 4k requires way more resources, and higher frefresh rate > 4k. Before deciding which screen resolution you should go for, you need to take into account other Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. You get a mix of good pix density & a decent frame count (assuming you’ve got a decent GPU) along with DLSS tech, your laughing. hey guys I currently have a LG 27gn950-b nano ips 144hz 1ms this is my first 4K monitor and I just got it today and I can already see the bad ips bleeding so should I go for 2k oled 27inch 240hz 0. The scaling isn't easily divisible between those pixel counts, so it Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now (1080 to 2k/4k is noticeable on a 28" monitor though)extra framerate feels so much better. 8x different in resolution. We ask that you please take a minute to read through the rules and check out the resources I'm personally torn between the Alienware Aw3423dw QD-Oled and the upcoming Cooler Master Tempest 27U. 6" USB 1080 monitors (neat setup actually). This only matters for the 4k gaming monitors, such as 4k 144hz monitors. I went 1440p ultrawide and that’s really good and it’s easier on my gpu. 2560x1440 is a very cool resolution for me up to 27 inches - there are 27/28 4K monitors, although I think up to 4K is more suitable for 31/32 inch monitors, you have greater tangibleness of a large workspace. I have a 1440p / 165Hz monitor for gaming and a 4K / 60Hz monitor for other stuff. If the ultrawide was also 2160p then it becomes more debatable (heavily based on use case), but options are very limited for those right now and price is high. The ones that do needed 4k, are professional content creators who need every bit of pixel they can squeeze out of and 4k works well with the programs they use. I've tried the 4K monitor for gaming as well. Changing resolutions between 2K and 4K messes up your desktop and window locations. 1440p DLSS quality vs 4K DLSS performance. Maybe in gamer circles, but 2K is an actual resolution standard and shorthand for anything 1080p in professional video. Or check it out in the app stores in 4K). Best combo of performance and value. At an arms length distance I can absolutely tell a difference, text is more pleasing to work with at the higher ppi. Comparing just 4k vs 2k vs full HD is just plain dumb. this is a non issue in any game that supports DLSS/FSR (which is most games from the last few years) TLDR: 2 x 27-in at 4K is sweeeeeeeeet!!!!! I just tested all resolutions this past week 1080, 1440, 2160 (FHD/1K, QHD/2K, UHD/4K respectively) looking to get two bigger monitors; for reference I was using a 15. 1440p 144hz. My original argument was buy the 4K version as I could have more 2k 144hz is better in most ways for gaming. As 1080p x 4 = 4k and 720p x 4 = 2k. For the topics of distance I disagree with the common online calculator, I have always felt this was more of marketing to get people into buy bigger displays, Instead of just buying what » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Hooked up to my 1440p monitor vs 4k TV on many titles, will have to dial down the graphics abit (e. The only noticeable difference in practice was that cleartype made a visible difference on smaller text but clarity and details for gaming and video content were just fine particularly if the monitor has a 4k downscaler so it’s able to use 4k input from devices like chromecast where it’d otherwise have to upscale from 1080p. We aren't ready for high refresh rate 4k gaming just yet. If you want your monitor's image to look pretty, going for an IPS with good HDR is useless, the horrible black levels, lower color gamut and bad contrast will make It The whole point of getting a 4k monitor is getting superior crispness and text clarity compared to lower resolution monitors, that's why they are so well-loved by the likes of designers, programmers and anyone who works with text a lot. Had a 2K monitor before my actual 27“ 4K monitor which I run in 2560x1440 HiDPI and the 2K monitor is nowhere near as crisp as the 4K monitor. im on an hp 4k 60hz 28inch, i mainly play games and couldnt imagine a lower resolution, the difference between 1440p and 2160p is huge. It's going to be mainly for data science work ( I want lots of space and good resolution for text) but I do occasionally play games. I am confused about the pc parts, especially the GPU and I feel selecting the monitor first might make this decision easier. I had been pretty settled on going with the 2k , but after looking at a friend's 27" 2560x1440 monitor, I was surprised at the visibility of the pixels. Monitors for editing: 2k Ultrawide vs 4k . Pixel Density on a 1440p 27inch monitor is considerably higher than that of a 24 inch 1080p monitor. At this point all you can do is give in and accept the fact that when anyone mentions 2k, they are referring to 1440p. Can someone please put a screenshot of 4k This depends on your setup. My recommendation would be to get a good 1440p 144-165hz monitor as the PS5 now supports native 1440p. the A little sidetrack here. But the way its going right now. Are OLED monitors made by LG reliable like the LG C3 TV? I'm a big fan of OLED but worried that it's too expensive and the burn-in risk. I would almost never run anything at non-native resolution. Idk how we're the minority. 27” @ 1440p or 32” @ 4K are the sweet spots and would be similar in clarity. My two candidates are the Asus proart 2k and Asus proart 4k. And then there is the quality of the display as well, not sure a TLC \ Roku 2k vs 4k, would be in the realm of a Panasonic or Sony 2k vs 4k or even 8k now. 2k and 4k are cinema aspect ratios/resolutions. The difference between 240hz and 144hz has diminishing returns I was trying to decide whether to get the 27 monitor at 4K 2160 or go for the 2K 1440 QHD as it is cheaper. So: 22-24 at 1080p - or doubled 4k 26-28 at 1440p or doubled 5k Or 31-32 at 4k ( my 2K, especially if you prioritize framerate and have a 144hz monitor. If for gaming, 2k is easier than 4k on your system (requires more performance) i personally love my 24" 2k monitor. On top of that you can use DLSS if your GPU supports it or FSR if it doesn't and see how upscaling works for you. If you get a 27" 4K monitor, you're not activating scaling because you "have to", but because it makes almost everything look better 🙂 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. I am looking for a 27” monitor, my debate is between a 2k screen with 99% adobe coverage Like the Benq(ZW2700PT) or a 4K monitor with 100% srgb coverage like the Viewsonic (VP2780-4K) I have bounced around on different forms and comparisons but I just can’t decide. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. With 4K the GPU is „taking care“ of the power. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Hi there, I'm deciding which external monitor to buy for my macbook air m1. For example I own a 17 incher. If the former, 32” 4K running at native resolution. » LG 27GL83A-B View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. By going 4k, it feels like a downgrade than an upgrade. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. » LG27GL850-B But I'm specifically talking about PC monitors here. I personally use a 27inch 4k monitor vertically. . For now I have 27'' 2K 165Hz display and 4K 60Hz TV, in the future I'll probably get 120Hz VRR 4K TV and play whatever mode I wanna play. If you don't mind much, 2k. I prefer how sharp the image looks over a higher refresh rate. But, with a higher FPS +300fps in-game, even with only a 144Hz monitor I noticed a slight difference in perceived fast 180 degree turn smoothness (1k feels slightly inconsistent vs 4k in a back to back test). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Note that the 3840×2160 resolution is also referred to as 4K UHD (Ultra HD) or 2160p, whereas 2560×1440 also goes by QHD, WQHD (Wide Quad HD) or 1440p – it’s sometimes incorrectly referred to as ‘2K’ – but this resolution actually stands for 2048×1080. I'd choose a high refresh rate monitor. » LG 27GN800-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. The difference from 144hz to 240 is extremely small. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B. Contrast is ok. If you are using a 27 inch monitor (ideal for quad HD 1440pits not called 2k), then 4k won't seem much of a difference. 4K vs 2K monitor: Design (Image credit: Shutterstock / Standret) In terms of the industrial design of the monitors, that will very much depend on the manufacturer in question and at which end of 4k monitors usually have lesser latency compared to 4k TVs unless it's a higher end model. I The noticeable difference is negligible honestly, and with modern games even at 1080p the laptop 3080ti doesnt always break 100 fps to utilize the 300hz monitor. At 240hz+ is when you'll notice snappier responses at 2k/4k. Reddit's #1 spot for Pokémon GO™ discoveries and research. Already preordered the new 4k 32in oled ultra gear to finish my setup. I have 2 monitors (165hz at 1080p, 75hz at 1080p) and a 4k smart TV at 60hz and I prefer the 4k tv over my 165hz gaming monitor. I could not make that decision so I ended up buying both a 240hz and a 4K monitor lol. I have a laptop with the same resolution/size as yours (maybe even the same panel, Lenovo Legion Pro, 16" 2560x1600 @ 165Hz), and a 28" 4k monitor (157 PPI). The width difference will be divided equally on the left and right side, the height difference will add more on the top and less on the bottom. That's OK, I have monitor arms so I don't really lose the desk space, but it's a bit overwhelming (I borrowed some 27" monitors from my office's display When it comes to 32″ monitors, 1440p resolution starts to show its weakness. I’m using 4k streaming on 2k monitor. From test 4k is running better than 1080p. Maybe the bottleneck of my PC plays an important role in my results but some games still have double the FPS at Of course, if you happen to use some ancient shit for work, you should stick to 100%, but the vast majority of users would get many more pros than cons from scaling. Basically it's extra crisp definition vs immersive FOV. Planning to pull the trigger on a new monitor got the office but not sure if I should go 2K or 4K. am not joking on this. Best combos of performance and value. Having a 2k monitor is just gonna lower fps and be even less noticeable of a visual difference. 4k OLED monitors are currently 42" or larger, which is an absurdly big screen for PC gaming in most setups. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I have a 2014 iMac 27 hooked up to a Dell U2718Q 27 inch 4k monitor and a Dell U2515Hx 25 inch 2k monitor. According to my results, I would rarely expect 360 FPS in 1440p and I get closer to the 240Hz offered by 4K monitors. However with 15 inch displays perhaps the difference is more subtle. I actually scaled back to 1440p (2k) just because that's the res I run my desktop, and my display is slow as crap at switching resolution. Meaning, the curves are sharp and not pixelated with 4K and 32” and 2K and 27”. Also 2k and 4k aren't really interchangeable. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now You will need to use scaling and some games don't work well with that. 144hz does feel really smooth even just moving the mouse around, though 4k is the bigger improvement If you set your display resolución to 1440p,1080 and allow 4k the Xbox will ignore your display settings and will always trigger 4k HDR for 4k HDR compatible games. I know oled is better but is it worth it? The monitors are aw3423dwf (799$) and m28U or any else IPS monitor thats cheaper than 600 dollars. When in 1080p? Well I immediately feel like there is some blurriness. Is it worth to buy a 4k monitor for ps5? Now I have a 27" 1440p monitor but I am thinking about changing it to a 4k 27". Hi all, Currently using a BenQ EL2870U as my monitor, its a 4k monitor but I changed the resolution to 2560x1440 as 4k text was too small. 32" is too nig for me. If it will be your only monitor, get the 4k, as OLEDs aren't amazing as the only monitor (text rendering, having to be careful about burn in, etc). They not made it brighter because of burn in . The ProArt 27" 4k (PA279CV) vs. Or check it out in the app stores and scaling it means there’s not much real estate difference to 2K. Display resolution setting in any Xbox known to man only affects UI and playback compatibility for apps in the system, that's it. In fact, Windows believe even Full HD on a 14" screen is too pixel-dense, so by default it scales it up by 150%. I don't have any specific model in mind. I`m stuck If you set the GPU to use integer scaling you wouldn't really notice the difference vs a 1080p display of the same size as the 4K display would map 1080p -> 4K perfectly. I find text clarity lacking a bit even on 32" 4K monitors, but that's what I'm stuck with because it's the best we can currently have at 32". In practice tech like DLSS has muddied the waters for native resolution big time where running a game at the equivalent of 1440p resolution, then AI upscaled to 4K often ends up looking just as good as native 4K but with better antialiasing. 2k Monitor vs 4k Monitor - Purchase Help! Hello! I'm at a cross road. *I own a 3070. I have a 4K monitor, and the difference, to me, between 1440p and 4K is bigger than the difference between 1080p and Most 4K displays are designed to handle lower-resolution content effectively. I want to clarify what it means practically (as I'm deciding based on specs and can't connect my laptop and see the difference). It's a huge misconception. I'd definitely not give up on a 4K TV even with only 60Hz support, a big 4K TV is just too good to give up on. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Like refresh rates of a monitor, the higher you go, the smaller of a difference there is (ie: going from 1khz to 2khz (0. high to med). ingame i see pretty much no 4K 16:9 can resolve more fine detail, 1440p ultrawide will show more view to the sides. I mostly play single player open world games so 60hz is plenty enough (most of the games dont support 120hz anyway) and gamepplay is enhanced by HDR colour output, so under 400€ you Technically you are correct. The jump from 60 to 144 is far more impactful. If you are worried about performance, it’s better to turn down the graphical settings than it is to turn down the resolution. 27" 4k is already higher pixel density than 32" 2k. This is also why apples 5k display is 28inch - its effective resolution is 1440p. I recently pulled my gaming PC off my 4k OLED TV and moved it to my 1080p monitors to use the computer for work. It all really depends on your budget, though. I’m using a 27" 1440p monitor at 125% scaling and there is no way in hell I’ll go back to those ugly 100% fonts. My gpu is a 4080s so I think İ can handle anything. 4k monitors are the king for image sharpness compared to 1080p and 1440p, which is the View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. g. A few determining factors : Price is roughly $100 - 200 between the two, but am concerned if the SL3 could run into problems running a 4K monitor? Scaling - I only plan to go maximum 27 inch, and run the SL3 and monitor on extended display. 4k monitors, especially the 27" and 24" ones, are made to be used in native resolution and DPI upscaling; the on the desktop for texts and stuff yes but in games no. It's slightly worse than native 4k but it's a step up from 2k if you can push that resolution. Big question is will you have a second monitor with it. 3ms and Idk if I can tell the difference Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If you don't want to break the bank on a nice 4K monitor On a small monitor like that the difference between 4k and 1440p will be tough to notice. The best gaming monitor with an Oled panel and ultrawide. 2k vs 4k monitor - ppi We are Reddit's primary hub for all things modding, from troubleshooting for beginners to creation of mods by experts. And yet there are still lots of people (especially in r/pcmasterrace) who claim that 1440p vs 4K at 27-28” is “unnoticeable” and barely worth itand yet you and I can clearly tell 5K looks noticeably better than 4K at the same size, let alone 1440p to 4K which If the "looks like" scaling option in the display settings are right, I think 24/25" 1440p with 120ish DPI would provide the perfect UI/text size. - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. I'm on PC and have a 3090, and got a 4k monitor, but I returned it to get a 1440p monitor with 165 Hz, and I think its the best way to go. Problem is, the downgrade is visuals is bad so I'm thinking of upgrading my monitors. I rarely even use my 165hz monitor anymore after getting my 4k tv lol. Noob question but will there be a clear difference between 2k and 4k in a 27'' monitor? Like right now I have a 4k monitor and if I set the resolution to 1440p it looks horrible but maybe that's because native resolution is much higher? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The experience 1440p does not scale linearly into 4k, meaning if you display 1440p on 4k then sometimes 2 pixels on your screen will equal 1 pixel ingame, and sometimes 1:1, making a kind of awkward, somewhat slightly blurry picture that just looks weird. If theres only 1 arm length between ur eyes and the monitor, I honestly think 27inch is the maximum size u should get. My preference is with the 4K monitor from a general usability standpoint. I do use 4k monitor “Lg 27up650”, it is clean 60hz plus supports HDR. Far more than most people wouldnt need or appreciate the difference in PPI in a <16' laptop between those high resolutions or 4k. Almost 20% higher pixel density is a lot more noticeable than It sounds, especially when one of the monitors is sub 100 ppi. Running 1080p on a 1440p monitor usually looks like crap. The difference between 1080p at 27inch and 4k is very noticable, but what's even noticable right off the bat is worse colors and contrast of a matte panel compared to a glossy panel, if you took a test with random folks with resolution of the monitor hidden, one is 1080p 27inch glossy other is 4k 27inch matte, most people will say the 1080p If u have a massive 32 inch monitor. I bought a 4K monitor and the difference is absolutely nuts. Thoughts: 1080p is actually hugely AMAZING for gaming. Sitting within a normal Are you comparing a specific 1080p (what you call 2k) monitor against a specific 4k monitor? In terms of monitor to monitor comparisons there are more differences than just the size and In terms of resolution, 4k at 27in is pretty much a waste IMO. The smaller monitors aren't likely to release until late 2023, and expect those to be insanely expensive, like the Odyssey G8 34" QD-OLED which is Are you asking if there is a distinct difference solely between 2k and 4k at 27 inches? The answer is yes, but probably not enough to justify the extra cost. But still there is a problem, now 21:9 and 32:9 are becoming more popular, with huge horizontal footprints. I currently have a BenQ 32in 4k monitor and I think that's a great size. For slow-paced games with a lot of eye candy (or eye candy mods) there is a noticeable difference in image quality. on top of that most gaming 4k monitor fail to meet the 4k standard for a display. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or For me, this makes no sense. And I tried for example The Last of Us Part 2 on it and even though they say the game is 1440p it still was better and more clear on the 4k 32 inch display. If the source is 4k, of course a 4k native will look better than a 2k native, but if the source is 2k, 2k native looks noticeably better than a 4k downscaled. Between those 2 4k for sure. So my two monitor options are: A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Reddit favorite monitors. This way all had basically 1440p levels of screen real-estate. But by all means, go ahead and test for yourself. average cost of a real 4k hdr monitor. Games I play: Dota 2, resident evil series, gears 5 and want to buy cyberbug when its on sale. I also use a 4k tv in the living room and tbh 4k looks better for ps5. 25ms difference), and so on. For example: Architecture and landscape are usually worth the highest resolutions your computer can handle. I am used to a 1080p for everything (existing monitor, tv, phone). As a graphic artist that relies on typographic accuracy 4K is the only way to go IF the monitor like mine is 32” (or larger). That way you can see how much of a difference there is in 1440p vs 4K for yourself. Especially those staring at text all day, like you stated you do. I have a 28 inch 4k 60 hz Asus monitor but is a TN panel then I bought a 32 Inch 4k 144 hz monitor in 2021 and tried in 2022 a 27 inch 1440p Asus. If you expect to be forced to play 2k on 4k, go for 1440p. 4K is nice. Or check it out in the app stores 2K VS 4K Monitor . In my experience it is even possible to gauge the difference using a 1440p monitor and DLDSR. All things being even - price, pitch, viewing angles, brightness, response time, Adobe and sRGB standards, contrast, etc - which monitor do you choose: It's so nice to have such a long screen vs the 4k display which looks pretty Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now It isn’t. If you are asking if there is a distinct difference between HDR/non-HDR, the answer is yes, and the price difference could very well be worth it. I was going to go with 3x 27" super curved 2K monitors, but measuring it out, it takes up the entirety of my desk. It really doesn't do anything at all. However, since I’m not, I think 1440p isn’t that much of a compromise as text still looks pretty crisp at 27 inches as long as you aren’t Most times i have to use 1080p on 4K TV. I am building a new PC with a 7900 XT, and considering upgrading my monitors. Vs a 576 zone Mini Led 4K panel. I am now between 2 monitors for my mini pc whose stats are: 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1240P Processor with a 12 core 16 thread design and a maximum turbo frequency of 4. The viewing difference is blatantly obvious. Your tv upscales to 4k anyway but using a 4k monitor on 1440p for whatever reason you will see a good difference and sharpness and detail but still nothing to complain about. There is a compromise with 2k where you can use DLDSR and force the monitor to be 4k to technically have a 4k 240hz monitor. I have an Odyssey G9 (5120x1440p 240Hz) and I can’t really see any image quality difference between it and my 4K 60Hz TV. See our recommendations for the best 1440p monitors. When in 2K resolution everything looks crisp. But the CPU is always the bottleneck of the game. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to People don't realize the difference between 1k and 2k is NOT the same difference between 2k and 4k (which is up to 4x, not double like most people think). If you want to game at 120fps and you can only hit that at 2k, get a 2k native monitor, don't get a 4k 120hz and downscale it. If the latter, 27” 4K and set the display to scaled 1920 x 1080. 3GHz Intel Iris X (80EUs) integrated GPU (4k supported). it's important to keep in in mind that a 4K display running DLSS Performance still has higher IQ than both a native 1080p display and a 1440p display running DLSS Quality Yeah i have 2 main monitors and 1 additional, in terms of space in different monitors I'm fine, the problem is that those monitors are actually low quality ips screens that look like shit and the colors are awful, i just want to buy myself a wide high quality 2k 144hz screen to I returned my 4k hdr mini led monitor for 2 lg qhd oled monitors, while the 4k monitor is sharper and brighter I think the oled panels look better overall. since i prefer to only have 1 monitor 4k feels nice because its like having the space of 2 screens in 1. (Btw, you If the choice within your budget is between 2K OLED and 4K mini LED, you'd be making different compromises with each of those options. The 1440p monitors ran with no scaling, and the 4k at 150% scaling across Mac, Windows, and occasionally Linux. One blog will say the difference between 2k and 4k is not noticeable the next will say 4k is essential for design another saying the size of the screen makes a huge difference and determines what resolution you should go for. 1440 Ultra Wide 34" Curved vs 4k 144HZ 27" . The display is really going 32" 4K monitor - I'm afraid that everything will look too small and scaling kinda defeats the purpose (correct me if I'm wrong). But blame it on marketing for adverting their 1440p monitors as "2k". If it existed, it would mean "half 4K" (as in "half the horizontal definition") so 1920x1080 <- pet peeve of mine, but I lost What about Unity Engine, Unreal Engine, Blender, and scaling? Is it better in 4K but does it take a lot more GPU just having two 4K monitors? I don't want monitors bigger than 28". Will 1. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I am also concurrently building a pc. I use a 60hz, 4K, 28" monitor as my primary work and play monitor. But I'm talking about on a 4K TV. Or check it out in the app stores Gaming on a 4K monitor vs 2K monitor. It’s weird ! 200 nits is nothing ! Once try lcd monitor at 200 nits and you can’t see much difference between darks , OLED contract and local dimming is only point OLEDs and other things is not good totally . It might be worth heading to a Best Buy or other local computer store and checking out the devices they have on display. Makes me wish I’d bought a 27" 4K monitor instead. You get the same pixel density as that of your current 24″ 1080p display – roughly 92 ppi. Can't imagine going back to 1080p or even 1440p. For better 4k gaming, see GIGABYTE M27U or LG 27GN950-B Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Even 1080p on a 4K monitor looks better because it can display exactly 1 pixel for every 4 on the monitor. I run this setup right now. 5" difference in width, and 2" difference in height. 1440p upscaled to 4K looks a good bit worse than native 1440p. Just maybe use a different Mod Yeah 5K 27” is really good and is definitely a noticeable upgrade over my 4K 28”, but sadly no 120hz+ panels with it. I plan on getting two of either of these monitors: LG UltraGear QHD 27-Inch Gaming Monitor 27GL83A-B GIGABYTE M28U 28" 144Hz Gaming 4K Monitor My bigger question is scaling, how is Windows 11 and macOS scaling in 2024? I understand that 27" 1440p is better for macOS because 4K at 27" looks odd with scaling issues at 110ppi or 220pi. Edit: If you have the budget, go for 4k, and 32". Long story short, I think you should Which monitor makes more sense for both gaming and development (Game Dev, Blender 3D, Video Creation, and Programming)? I plan on getting two of either of these monitors: LG I use (simultaneously) two 4K monitors @75Hz for gaming rdr2 on full ultra settings, GPU 4K sync’d @70Hz to match the monitors. If you don't want to see pixels, 4k. You can use a Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The CPU has a TDP 40W power, 12MB cache, and 1. Or check it out in the app stores Isn't the price difference between 4k@144 and 2k@144 pretty big? I don't have the money rn (saving up and planning to buy the pieces during the year). Thinking of either getting a 32" 2k or 27" 4k - any recommendations? The menu bar on a mac gets too small on a 4k screen doesn't it? I understand 4k is important for images and video, but I am mainly looking to use the screen for coding. What an original comment For programming I’d look at a vertical 1440 p 27-32 inch to use alongside your other monitor. For me the visual difference on a monitor between 1440 and 4K is barely Same. Does any one test it too? Or am I better with buying 2k Monitor and lower rtx? After various setting changes and running all games at both 4K mostly maxed vs 3440x1440 21:9 I'd have to say hands down the 2K is the better experience. Some feel differently than I do. 51m and 0. Hi İm going to buy a monitor. Come on, IPS isn't necessarily better. Or check it out in the app stores 2k is kinda the sweet spot for gaming with a 4090 you can hit the super high frames to keep up with a super high refresh rate. The PS5 doesn't upscale to 4k, the monitor does. 3ms, I have an OLED 4K TV and an OLED 2K ultra wide monitor and I can't see my 4K IPS the same way again!. Both are good, but I'd get the 120hz (or more) monitor if you play multiplier action games or something, but a 4k monitor if you play top-down or singleplayer games. 61m. Especially for older games which are 1080p upscaled ones. Weapons and armors are alright too, but I would only use it on stuff that's going to be unique to your character. When you play a 2K video or any content with a lower resolution on a 4K display, the display will automatically upscale the content to its native resolution. (PS5 doesn`t support 2K and so disappointing for me). I've tried at 1080p and at 4k - the difference is noticeable at that size, but it's not huge. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. However, if you're more of a casual gamer, then 4k is better. 75" inch extension on the side kink the neck, I don't think so. It is best just to call them by their vertical pixel count. I found resolutions between the three that are close enough so that I don't have problems moving from monitor to monitor and these are all provided by macOS. Most people will notice the difference in text quality of a 27" monitor at normal viewing distances at 1440p vs 4k. I personally had at one point two 27" 1440p monitors, and a 28" 4k monitor (intended for movies and shows which typically are 1080p or 4k only, not 1440p). It will look slightly better. I bet ur sitting slightly further back or putting the monitor further away from ur eyes. This is especially true for 1440p. 2K is 2048x1080 and is designed for digital film projectors. If you're gonna have 2 monitors, OLED all the way Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I'm wondering if 2K or 4K textures really make a noticeable difference if I'm only running the game at 1920x1080? maybe mountains if you're a climber) 2k is worth it even on a 1k monitor. 4 GHz. I now have a 4k 32" 60hz display and a 1440p 32" 165hz freesync display I got afterwards. Mini LED is best option for now and enough bright and balanced. » LG 27GR95QE-B - OLED, 240hz, . So the best option? Do the most viable. And again i have to use 1080p on 2K monitor. UHD is Ultra High Definition, sometimes referred to as Quad Full HD, its 4 times 1080p, or 2160p (4K). According to this article, 2k @ 27" is "good for non-retina" at 110 PPI; 4k @ 27" is "the bad zone" at 163 PPI. Get a good 2K monitor and ignore 4K until you have enough money to buy a second monitor just for testing because it's nice I’m building a gaming PC soon with a $3,000 budget, and I’m curious how big a difference a 2560x1440 (is this considered 3k?) monitor is compared to 2K really makes no sense as the horizonal is 2560 if it is a 16:9 monitor. 4K doesn't make much sense on screens smaller than 32" and even there it's still a questionable improvement which arguably doesn't justify the increased HW demands. You should look for a 4k monitor if: You crave sharp image and text clarity. Its honestly not that bad for a 32inch monitor to have 2k resolution given ur sitting further away. Both are almost same cost. COD runs at mostly the same framerate as my 3440 monitor in 4K but I genuinely don't see a big difference in picture quality. Depends on the person. The difference is If you need every advantage you can get, then 240hz is the way. And 4k is 3840x2160p, the round up there makes more sense. It's a 3. I also just tried "looks like 2560x1440" sent to my monitor with 24" simulated display on the 27 and that looks like the 2k display I had a while ago which was a good size for me. Yes, 4k display is the way to go. Hi so ive got a new 4070ti super build and was wondering is it worth getting a 4k monitor i know it can run games 4k with dlss and frame gen but am i better off having a smoother higher frame experience on max settings at Regardless of the budget, I can tell you how it looks from my perspective, and I have a 2k monitor used for graphic design (NEC PA271Q ColorProof) - WQHD res. 34" ultrawide monitor 3440x1440p - I'm not gaining any vertical space and don't know if the ultrawide format will make that much of a difference. You need to get at least a 32 inch 4k monitor to notice a difference when wondering which monitor to get from these two, i've heard that there is no much of a difference between 2k and 4k in a 27" monitor. » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. 2K vs 4K Monitor Spreadsheets & Text Only . Monitor upgrade: 4K vs 144+ Hz, which is the better upgrade? Imo 2k (1440p) is the way to go for a 27” monitor. It is a long ways off of 2k. Depends what you want. Or check it out in the app stores So in that regard watching 4k content but outputted as 2k by that monitor, watching it about 3 feet away looks fantastic. You can always run a 4k at 1:1 and get awesome screen space - but the text is tiny. 14" or even 15" is way too small for most users to tell the difference between Full HD, 2k, and 4k. ywtuxn kdyrft uwtgzfi pmual vjz loaev iuz wiyfm jgwpbgpu nmyucoup